How leaders use Self-Determination Theory to improve motivation and build a team’s well-being, resilience, and performance optimization

By Kacy Maddox, teacher, coach, and United States Military Service family member.

My grandfather, Alfred Wayne Maddox, who served in the Navy for 6 years, including 2 years of service on the U.S. Naval vessel Shangri La, instilled in me that effective leaders provide purpose, motivation, and direction. As a teacher and a basketball coach, I have seen the value of creating a motivational environment to optimize performance and well-being. Whether it’s for a team or a unit, well-being, resilience, and performance can be improved through enhanced leadership that supports autonomy, fosters belonging, and encourages competency
Some big-name athletic coaches and leaders preach things like, “You’re responsible for bringing your own energy, for motivating yourself, for bringing the juice.” And in a few high-level, high-functioning team settings with a longstanding tradition, culture, or members, this might be possible. 
But what happens when teams don’t bring their own energy or motivation? If leaders are responsible both for the people they lead and for accomplishing the task at hand, they are also responsible for the motivation it will take to get there. Motivation doesn’t have to sound like yelling louder or look like pushing harder, but when done in a more meaningful way, it can improve an individual’s well-being and the performance of the team as a whole.
When leaders apply Self-Determination Theory (introduced by psychologists Edward Deci and Richard Ryan), they work to create and foster a climate that motivates and addresses the basic psychological needs of its members­: autonomy, a sense of belonging, and competency. Before setting out on this journey toward better health and better results, however, it’s important to consider the strengths and needs of your team. What are your unit’s greatest strengths and capabilities? How can you best cultivate these strengths? What is a key issue that your unit must address to increase motivation and goal achievement? What holds you back? Consider these important questions as you plan and evaluate the journey towards a motivational environment. 
Address your unit’s basic psychological needs
Self-Determination Theory holds that people are inherently wired to improve and achieve goals. This drive is supported, or thwarted, based on a person's perceived fulfillment of the 3 basic psychological needs: autonomy, belonging, and competence. These are the basic elements needed for team members to pursue and achieve goals. Leaders can address and nurture these needs to help move individuals toward a more intrinsic source of motivation—one in which team members engage in an activity for satisfaction derived from the activity itself. This type of motivation can withstand adversity and continue efforts despite changes that might occur due to shifting goals or circumstances. Here are 3 ways to address those basic needs.
1. Support autonomy 
The first basic need is the sense of autonomy. or the independence and freedom to self-govern when it comes to performance or achievement, particularly in the context of a team setting. Autonomy is evident when a person acts with decision and willingness. Their voice is heard and valued within the context of the team. 
To allow for autonomy, leaders can acknowledge their team members’ thoughts and feelings and encourage choice, self-initiation, and regulation of behavior. This minimizes pressure and the demands to control others. Leaders demonstrate their support for independent behaviors by: 
  • Providing choices 
  • Offering reasoning for decisions
  • Acknowledging a team member’s thoughts, feelings, or opinions
  • Supporting and encouraging the learning process 
2. Foster belonging
The second basic psychological need leaders should work to satisfy—to increase intrinsic or autonomous motivation, according to Self-Determination Theory—is a sense of belonging. This is the most accessible need, and it’s easy to spot as a leader, identifying both the need for, and experience of, team cohesion. 
Leaders who support team relatedness can be characterized by sincere respect, unconditional acceptance, and genuine care for team members. Leaders don’t just look at what each individual can do for the team, but who they are. Leaders foster a sense of belonging for team members by: 
3. Encourage competency
The third way for team members to experience an increased sense of well-being and improve their performance is for a leader to satisfy the need to see how their behaviors are effective. In order to achieve this, leaders can offer opportunities to complete a task with a high degree of success and give specific feedback to boost a team member’s confidence and help them improve. Encouraging feelings of competence is a multi-faceted endeavor in which leaders need to consider goal setting, the nature of their feedback, optimism, and coping strategies. To encourage these feelings of confidence and ability, leaders can: 
Leaders who consider the needs of their team open the door to greater well-being and better performance, increased skill, and the motivation needed to successfully complete tasks. Working toward a motivational environment with these needs in mind is an effective way to encourage a team that can overcome adversity and will grow in pursuit of increasingly difficult goals.
To learn more, read HPRC’s articles on 3 strategies to build motivation and how you can create good habits to achieve your goals even when motivation runs low.

About the Author 

Kacy Maddox teaches high school English and coaches a girls’ basketball team in Frisco, Texas. She is pursuing graduate studies in Positive Coaching and Athletic Leadership. The granddaughter and family member of many United States Military Service Members, she resides in Plano, Texas, with her soon-to-be husband and her two dogs.

* The opinions and assertions expressed herein are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of USU or DoD. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the author and do not reflect the views, opinions, or policies of The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. Mention of trade names, commercial products, individuals, or organizations does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. The author has no financial interests or relationships to disclose.